Posts Tagged ‘URL shorteners’

Are URL Shorteners Good For SEO?

Monday, November 15th, 2010

You’ve seen those pesky URL shorteners. They’re usually a normal URL (yourbrand.com) followed by a string of unintelligible characters. They may also be characterized by a short phrase such as yourbrand.com/URL-shortener. Another version involves a third-party site like tinyurl.com or bit.ly. The primary domain is followed by a strnig of unintelligible characters such as tinyurl.com/h3co2y, or by a short phrase like tinyurl.com/ULRshortener. Are these good?

There are benefits to using URL shorteners. Here are a few:

  • Short URLs encourage more click throughs
  • Shorter URLs also get shared more often
  • Short URLs are more likely to get linked to since they are shared more often
  • Short URLs can be tweeted and retweeted
  • If done correctly, they can pass PageRank

So what’s that mean, “if done correctly.” In short (pardon the pun), it means you must use a 301 redirect as opposed to a 302 redirect.

A 302 redirect is a temporary redirect and it doesn’t pass PageRank. A 301 redirect (a permanent redirect), on the other hand, does pass PageRank. That means you’ll benefit a whole lot more over the long term with a 301 redirected short URL.

If you plan to use a third-party URL shortener like tinyurl or bit.ly then you need to make sure they use a 301 redirect. Otherwise, the service won’t benefit you a great deal. Any inbound links the short URL attracts will not help your SEO efforts.

How Twitter Is Going For The Jugular

Saturday, July 10th, 2010

For a couple of years now Twitter has been the subject of much discussion about future monetization plans. The subject that has been on everyone’s minds is, just how will Twitter make money? But that may not be the biggest question to ponder.

What I’m about to tell you seems rather obvious now that I think about it. But the truth is, I haven’t really thought about it until now.

You know those pesky URL shortening services? There used to be just a few that affiliate marketers would use to mask their affiliate links so their incomes couldn’t be ripped off. Or savvy webmasters would use them to cloak their redirects. Since the advent of Twitter, however, everyone uses them – mostly to keep their messages under the 140 character limit.

Well, what if Twitter had its own URL shortener?

Here’s the secret: Pretty soon it will.

So why is that important? Because the URL shortener, according to the August 2010 issue of Website Magazine will also include metrics so that users can see how effective their tweets are.

While there are some URL shortening services now that provide that service, Twitter’s own URL shortening service with metrics could be competitive enough to shut some of them down. And if that happens then Twitter’s monetization plans could include an upgraded service for businesses.

It will be interesting to see what happens when Twitter’s URL shortening service becomes widely available.

What do you think? Will you use it?

Youtube Gets Its Own URL Shortener

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

URL shorteners are a dime a dozen. If you don’t what they are, they are a shorter URL that represents a longer URL. The first really popular URL shortening service was Tinyurl, but it has its drawbacks. You can’t track when someone clicks on your links is one.

An example of how an URL shortener works can be found on Tinyurl’s own website:

Turn this URL:

http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?t

ype=3&campid=5336224516&toolid=10001&customid=tiny-
hp&ext=unicycle&satitle=unicycle

into this tinyURL:

http://tinyurl.com/unicycles

Since Twitter has forced us all to communicate in 140 character soundbites, many other URL shorteners have arrived on the scene, some of them allowing you to track your licks. A few have attempted to offer compensation for using them. But I wouldn’t recommend most of them.

Google introduced its own URL shortener not too long ago. And now, the latest: Youtu.be.

Like Goo.gl, Youtu.be is not for widespread use. The former can only be used for Google products while the latter can only be used for YouTube videos. I guess those are selling points.

I suppose there is benefit in using Youtu.be. It has stability. You know the YouTube brand isn’t going anywhere any time soon. But can you track who’s watching your videos? Can you count clicks and see the effectiveness of your promotions? I see nothing yet that would indicate you can track your clicks. Until that happens, I’m not sure there is a real benefit to using Youtu.be. Other URL shortners, like bit.ly, will allow you to track your clicks.