Posts Tagged ‘ranking factors’

A Quick Glance At SEO Ranking Factors

Thursday, November 3rd, 2011

Search engine marketing professionals love to talk about ranking factors. Sometimes they get a little too deep in the weeds. But I like what Danny Sullivan has done at Search Engine Land in creating The Periodic Table of SEO Ranking Factors.

I like that he kept is simple and that he made it visual. That’s a big leap forward in terms of learning SEO for someone new to the game. Let’s highlight a few things.

  • First, notice that on-page factors are really important for SEO, and the most important ranking factors are the quality of your content and the quality of your keyword research.
  • In terms of HTML, title tags are the most important ranking factor.
  • And for site architecture, making your site crawlable is extremely important.
  • Off-page factors that are important including link quality and anchor text at the very top with trust and authority also important. Country and locality are important on the “personal” scale, though I must admit I’m not sure what he means by that.

For negative factors, if your site is blocked often in the search engines or through social sharing, then you will lose rank. Also, cloaking and link buying are big no-nos.

While I’m aware that every SEO will have his or her own preferences, I for one at least agree with Danny on the big picture. The most important things to think about in terms of SEO are quality content, quality links, and building trust. If you do those things you’ll go a long way to earning search engine ranking status and you won’t have to chase the algorithms.

Are PageRank And Rankings Related?

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

It’s easy to get confused about such concepts as PageRank and search engine rankings if you don’t spend a great deal of time studying how search engines work. One common misconception about search rankings is that they are tied to one’s PageRank number. This is not the case.

PageRank is a way Google has devised to assign an authority number to websites within the same niche based on how many other sites link to it and the authority ratings of those sites. It is an algorithm based largely on quantity and quality of backlinks.

While search engine rankings also rely, to some extent, on backlink analysis, the factors influencing are much broader in scope. There are literally hundreds of factors that influence how a web page ranks for the keywords it targets. One important ranking factor is domain age. A website that has been around for 10 years or longer has a much higher chance of ranking for a particular keyword than a page that is just 1 year old. The age difference, however, is not a guarantee of higher rankings as that ranking factor is used in conjunction with hundreds of other ranking factors. But it is one factor that can give a particular website an edge in the ranking wars.

Webmasters should not confuse PageRank and search engine rankings. They are not related and one does not influence the other.

What SEO Ranking Factors Are Important Today?

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

A few days ago Mike McDonald wrote a blog post about ranking factors in 2009. I completely agree with most of what he says in the article. To summarize, here’s what he says, with SEOmoz Rand Fishkin’s blessings, is important this year:

  • Title tags
  • Anchor text
  • Link diversity
  • Social media and mobile marketing

I would completely agree. I think Title tags have always been important as has anchor text. Link diversity hasn’t always been at the top of the list, but in the last few years it has risen to the top as Google has refined its link quality algorithms. Social media and mobile marketing as ranking factors are new on the scene and I think they’ll rise in importance. But probably not in ways that most of us will imagine.

So what do Mike and Rand agree are not important? Check this out:

  • H1 tags
  • Keyword density
  • W3C validation

Again, great points. But I still think H1 tags are somewhat important. Not as important as they used to be, but important nonetheless. It isn’t even so much that they are bigger than everything else, but if your H1 tag is at the top of the page like it is supposed to be then it becomes a lot more important. If you fill your page with H1 tags then those H1 tags look spammy and become less important. The proper way to use H tags is in declining size from the top to the bottom, which is the same way that newspapers traditionally size their article heads, in the order of importance. If you do it that way then all the H tags are more important.

Still, good article. Thanks to Mike McDonald and WebProNews for a good discussion on ranking ractors.

Is Keyword Density Important?

Wednesday, September 10th, 2008

You hear about keyword density a lot in article marketing and SEO. What that means is you take the number of times you use your targeted keyword and divide it by the number of total number of words in your content. So if you write a 1,000 word article and your keyword is “lunch money”, which you use 15 times in the article, then your keyword density is .015%. Article marketing gurus like to say that the optimal keyword density is somewhere between 2%-6%.

There are several things wrong with this theory. Firstly, natural writing without focusing on keyword usage will fall somewhere between that range anyway for well-written content. Secondly, search engines now recognize synonyms for certain words and can ascertain what your content is about on the basis on those synonyms, the use of which will make your writing less staid and robotic. Thirdly, there are other factors involved in ranking web pages in the search engines. Keyword usage is only one factor, and it isn’t even the most important factor. It is important, but it isn’t the most important.

Search engines rank web pages according to many factors – last count, there are more than 150 ranking factors. One of the most important ranking factors – more important than actual keyword usage – is your page headline. I’m not talking about your meta title. I mean the verbiage in your headline, which should be written as an h1 tag and should use your primary keyword. Subheads are also important. Other on-page factors should be considered and some off-page factors like link relevance, anchor text of inbound links, etc. Note that these factors involving keyword usage have nothing to do with keyword density. They are ranking factors involving weight of importance, much like a college professors grading scheme.

Keyword density is a false measure of on-page SEO. You’d be better off learning how to make your pages work using as many of the ranking factors as possible.

Ranking Factors For Small Businesses And Google Maps

Sunday, August 10th, 2008

Mike Blumenthal gave a presentation at SMX on search rankings in Google Maps and the presentation is published at his blog. I think you’d have had to be at the conference to get the full gist of the presentation, but one thing stuck out at me in the presentation that I’d like to point out.

Slide 2 notes that 80% of a variation in local search rank “can be explained by distance from the centroid on certain searches.” What I think that means is your rank in Google Maps will depend primarily on two things: The search term used and your business’s distance from a “centroid”. My understanding of centroid is that point at the center of a city that can be located on the map. This is usually identified as a GPS point, or grid coordinate. I suppose it can also be identified by latitude and longitude, but grid coordinates can be a lot more accurate.

Does this mean that businesses on the outskirts of town, in the suburbs, or outside of a city are at a disadvantage? Not necessarily. If someone is looking for a pizza in St. Paul, Minnesota, for instance, there are a lot of pizza joints in town. But do people generally search for “pizza” or do they search for a particular brand – say, Papa John’s or Dominoe’s? My bet is they look for a specific brand. But what if they do search for the general term?

It is likely that people looking for fishing equipment will search for the general terms that they want. Let’s say someone wants a “rod and reel”, but being the savvy searcher that they are, they know that a search for “rod and reel” at Google Maps won’t give them the whole story so they search for “fishing equipment” to see if they can find the nearest business that sells fishing equipment.

The first listing in St. Paul for “fishing equipment” is on County Road. Then there’s one in Woodbury and one on Tamarack Vlg in St. Paul. These are followed by a retail shop in Roseville, one in White Bear Lake, another one in Woodbury, and one on Stewart Avenue. The final three of the top 10 are in White Bear Lake, Oakdale, and on Rice St. in St. Paul. Are these good listings for that search term? Yes, but they’re all fairly well in the heart of St. Paul. What if you are located closer to the Mendota Heights area of St. Paul? Using the same search term and searching for businesses located in that area of town instead of St. Paul brings up a list of 10 businesses with a little crossover, but the interesting part is it leaves out some businesses that are on the first list and are closer to Mendota Heights than some that are listed.

For instance, Dick’s Sporting Goods on Tamarack Vlg. is on both lists, but Xiong Live Bait & Tackle, located on Rice St. in St. Paul is left off of the second list. Interestingly, Interior Alaska Custom Built Fishing Rods is on the second list, but not on the first whereas Hansen’s Little Bear Bait & Tackle, out at White Bear Lake, is. And to further complicate things, both lists do not rank the businesses in order of their proximity to the centroid. So we know that is not the primary consideration.

Blumenthal goes on to list several other ranking factors that include your business name and business category, reviews, web page citations, geo-references, explicit anchor text, and other traditional SEO factors. Now, I think those last two ranking factors are a big deal, even on Google Map. But I’d also say that business category plays a big part in whether your business will be found by searchers looking for your business. If you sell clothing and apparel for ladies, for instance, and you list your business in a category not related to clothing then you may not show up for results in that category, or if you do then it will be further down the list.

What all this really boils down to, I think, is that the ranking factors for Google Maps are a bit more complicated than for a regular search, but how many searchers actually search Google Maps? It gets used, of course, but most people will simply search Google for a business they are interested in and if you make a search for “fishing equipment st. paul minnesota” you will find that the list looks nothing like the list on Google Maps. You’d better hope your prospects use Google Maps.

Bottom line: List your business in Google Maps, but make sure that your website is highly optimized and submit your site to local business directories that allow users to review them. I believe these are the top three ranking factors for local businesses in any category.

Why Older Non-Optimized Sites Rank Better

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008

Kalena Jordan of Ask Kalena was recently asked this question:

Why do older unoptimized sites sometimes rank better than younger optimized ones?

It’s a good question and I like the way she answered it. I’m going to give my own answer now even though she and I are in agreement.

The search engines have well over 100 criteria that they judge when deciding which sites rank for specific keyword phrases. The algorithms are such that no criteria is weighted so heavily that it dominates all other criteria. On-page optimization is just one ranking factor. Other ranking factors that influence where websites fall in the line up include:

  • Age of the domain
  • Relevance of inbound links to the domain
  • Quality of inbound links to the domain
  • Server neighborhood of the domain
  • Registration history and future of the domain
  • Web page load time
  • Code to text ratio
  • Link attributes and graphic alt tags
  • Many, many more

There is more to website optimization than merely choosing the right keywords and placing them a number of times within your content. Internal links are important, site navigation is important, and there are a ton of off site optimization techniques that are looked at. If an older non-optimized site in your niche is outranking you, it is likely because it is doing enough things right that the one ranking factor (on-page optimization) simply isn’t enough to push it down and push you up.

The good news: Over time, if you keep doing enough of the right things, you should be able to bridge the gap.

Find out the 3 essential elements to ranking a web site well in any search engine.

Are All File Name Extensions Created Equal?

Saturday, June 14th, 2008

Yesterday, I posted about Google’s .0 prejudice and wouldn’t you know it – they changed it. It’s true. Google is now crawling and indexing URLs that end with .0.

But don’t think that all file name extensions are equal. They’re not. Matt Cutts makes it perfectly clear that some file name extensions are worthless and won’t be crawled. Specifically, .exe and .dll.

But that doesn’t mean that the file name extensions Google does index are ranked in any particular order of preference or hierarchy. Your .com extension, for instance, isn’t anymore valuable than a .biz, .net, or .org extension. Good SEO is good SEO and no matter what file name extension you use, all other factors being the same, using a .com file name extension isn’t going to put you over the edge. No added advantage. Factors that are much more important than file name extension include:

  • Age of domain
  • On-page SEO factors
  • Link building
  • File name
  • IP Address (bad neighborhood, anyone?)
  • Reputation

No sooner had I made my post and Google is tinkering with its policies again. Sometimes that’s good. This is one of those times. You can now have file name extensions that end with .0, but I learned something new by reading up on this subject this week. If you end all of your URLs with a / then you’ll never have to worry about the file name extension. Even before its change in policy, Google would have indexed a .0/ any day. Go figure.