Posts Tagged ‘Likes’

How Much Is A ‘Like’ Worth?

Saturday, May 21st, 2011

Small business owners all over the world are ga-ga over Facebook, and particularly Facebook Likes. But what’s the big deal? Are they really worth that much?

According to one marketer, if someone “Likes” your Facebook page, then they are over 90% likely to never look at it again. But what if that number is exaggerated and it’s only 45%? That’s still a lot.

Imagine getting 1,000 Likes to your Facebook page. That’s a lot of Likes by small business standards. If only 100 of those people ever return a second time, you’ve got a pretty small pool of potential customers. Does that put a Like in a whole new perspective for you?

But hold the phone. Anyone who has ever done any direct marketing knows that if you get a 2% response rate, then you’ve accomplished something. In other words, if only 20 out of 1,000 recipients to your direct mail campaign respond, then you’re making out like a bandit. So what’s so wrong with a 10% success rate?

Well, here’s the deal – that 10% isn’t actually doing anything. They’re just visiting your page again. And if you use the same 2% that you’d measure your success in direct mail by to your Facebook page, then you should measure it by positive outcomes like newsletter subscriptions, purchases, and visits to your website, not by Likes.

The bottom line is this … if you get a 2% positive outcome from among your Likes and you have 1,000 Likes, then that’s 20 new subscribers, or 20 new sales. Now cut it half – 10 new sales vs. 20. And what did it cost you? Nothing but your time. Measure that ROI against your direct mail ROI. Which one wins?

Likes Are The New Links: Why That’s Not Necessarily Good

Saturday, November 27th, 2010

According to an article in WebProNews, veteran Internet marketer Bruce Clay is predicting that ‘Likes’ will become the new ‘Links’. In other words, search engine algorithms will place a higher priority on social Likes instead of inbound links, but is that good?

In a way, yes. Clay makes a good point when he says that the list of sites that will rank at the top of the search engines will change overnight. He also makes a good point when he says that webmaster priorities will change from building bigger sites to building higher quality websites. But that’s only true on the short term. Long term, it won’t take long before ‘Likes’ get gamed as much as links.

I think Google and Bing already include some social media graphing in their ranking algorithms. How much, exactly, is anybody’s guess. But it’s quite possible that Google, if it could ever get its hands on Facebook data, could make Facebook ‘Likes’ a major part of its algorithm. If that happens, then I think you’ll see a mass shift from chasing links to chasing ‘Likes’. That won’t be good for the Web.

What that will effectively do for search engine optimization is create a circus. Rankings will then go to the websites whose owners can pay for the most ‘Likes’. ‘Likes’ will become currency in the same way that links are currency now, and Google will not be able to police those as effectively as they can now police links. That will be Facebook’s job. But how would Facebook approach it? Based on history, I’d say Facebook could be even more strict on ‘Like’ sellers than Google is on link sellers. Imagine having your profile and/or business page banned from Facebook forever.

Is that the way the Web is headed? I don’t know. If it is, then I say get ready for a ride because things are about to get interesting.